21 September 2009 ~ 13 Comments

Recent Occult Sightings In Muse’s “Uprising”

What made me interested in this group was the eerie chorus to their current single.

What’s with the pyramid shaped teddy bear bon fire?

3 teddy bears (1 very evil looking) coming up from the ground?

Red eyed teddy bears are the worst.

Check out the reptilian eyes (eat your heart out David Icke) and the fangs!

Now onto the juicy part, their album cover which simply visualizes the Antichrist’s travel to Earth through Saturn…

All summarized on the following picture collage…

Click To Enlarge

(This will SURELY get me on the Vatican’s shit list)

See Also:

13 Responses to “Recent Occult Sightings In Muse’s “Uprising””

  1. j 4 October 2009 at 12:16 PM Permalink

    very true, something is not right about this band.. I was searching for haarp on amazon and some muse stuff came up. (haarp=High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program … search HAARP – Holes In Heaven on google video) they have a dvd called haarp, their “origin of symmetry” album cover represents the haarp satellite arrays, even look at their other album covers. showbiz, absoution, they definitely have some satanic undertones. nwo anyone? youtube alan watt – how the media controls your mind

    • marcoponce 5 October 2009 at 6:40 PM Permalink

      alan watt is yet another vatican shill / controlled opposition, stay away from. Half truths can be dangerous.

      • Andrew 1 November 2009 at 5:22 PM Permalink

        How is Alan Watt a shill? He is not a part of any group but works independently, does not sell any products other than his own writings and video/audio presentations, and has no outside sponsors, relying solely on listener support to keep himself going. Furthermore, his website offers links to the subjects he covers so that you, yourself, can check what sources he is getting his information from. Oh, and he also doesn’t promote any alien conspiracy agenda, either. How exactly is this being a shill, then? Care to explain? If you have any evidence/information to back up your statement, please do so, otherwise it’s simply slander, of which there is already more than enough of on the internet, thank you very much.

        • marcoponce 19 November 2009 at 9:58 AM Permalink

          I will create some basic bullet points as to why I feel Alan Watt is a shill working towards the agenda of the Jesuits and their Vatican system…

          1 – He is very dodgy on REAL history in a lot of cases, especially on the Vatican and the controllers of it… the Jesuit order as noted by the video below…

          Allen Watt exposes the Jesuits?
          [youtube 3KpAESTzJcM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3KpAESTzJcM youtube]

          NOTICE HOW HE IS VERY DODGY ON THE SUBJECT!

          Remember… Only and ONLY after Alberto Rivera an ex-Jesuit under the extreme oath and induction left did you get other so-called ex-Jesuits leaving the order like Malachi Martin and write on the Order (with a green light by his general OF COURSE). But, never did Malachi get assassinated in the fashion Alberto got poisoned in. So, know that the generals Pedro Arrupe and Kolvenbach did this to aid the discrediting campaign against Alberto and the downplay the idea of the Order at the tip top of the grand conspiracy. So by having Alan Watt or Michael Tsarion talking about them without MUCH HISTORY at all doesn't mean squat to me.

        • marcoponce 19 November 2009 at 9:59 AM Permalink

          2 – WORST OF ALL… HE DISCREDITS THE ONLY WEAPON WE HAVE AGAINST THE DEVIL AND HIS MYSTERY BABYLON… THE BIBLE AND HIS SON JESUS!

          As noted by this video…
          [youtube fnT-TlyUiFQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fnT-TlyUiFQ youtube]

          By doing this, whether he knows it or not, he is aiding the Jesuits goal of creating atheists and etc.

          3 – Alan is now very close and featured a lot on the show of the ultimate gatekeeper of them all… ALEX CIA JONES! As noted by even adding him to his latest video effort "fall of the republic"

          Plus I will quote from one of my mentors Craig Oxley because I agree with him 100% on his stance on Alan Watt

          "Theres serious fear because their control is disappearing. When it drops to a certain level then these clowns will be put to one side and need real jobs for once. All the agency funding and lifestyle will fall down. Right now I'm going to u-turn on Alan Watt finally. This is my theory on Alan Watt. I believe British Intelligence through their Canadian branch, the CSIS have been clever with Watt. We know the Maltese control all sides so not everyone is going to follow or keep following Jones and company. So lets put another guy in the mix who looks very genuine and normal sitting on his sofa with a cigarette. Lets lure the people into a fall sense of security and grab them. I believe this is exactly the plan with Alan Watt. We hear him at one time slagging off radio/internet famous exposers such as Alex Jones etc. Slagging off the CIA controlled false patriot shows etc. Then we saw him taken on board the Alex Jones network and clique. This raised alarms quickly and with his constant dodgying the Jesuit issue and in any depth, well shows the agenda. Another reason he was bought onto the Alex clique was because of their falling support since being exposed. They needed someone supposedly with more credibility and loyal followers hoodwinked once again. Theres virtually no one speaking out thats not British Intelligence controlled. Only the ones who are poor, scrapping for a living or in a wooden box are real truthsayers. I don't care what Watt fan I offend, truth hurts, so tough!"

          Pretty soon I will be creating a post exposing so-called truthers and patriots which are really 100% shills and gatekeepers for ROME and their controlled opposition.

          I hope this response has been helpful Andrew.

  2. Andrew 3 November 2009 at 11:08 PM Permalink

    Thank you for your thorough explanation. At least now I see where you are coming from. I will try to explain why I disagree, and why I believe you should consider rethinking some things.

    1. I haven’t looked into the history of the Jesuit order much (maybe you could recommend some sources?), but the audio clip above doesn’t prove much to me, other than that Alan didn’t have much to say about that particular subject. Well, we all can’t all be experts on everything, and perhaps he didn’t find it relevant to what he was discussing previously or wanted to bring the conversation somewhere else, who knows? Saying that he was purposely avoiding talking about the Vatican because he is somehow in league with them is a far stretch in my opinion. If, however, you have more evidence, I will reconsider this, but for now it doesn’t tell me a whole lot. Anyway, how is what he talks about on his show spreading their agenda? This brings me to your second point.

    2. This here is where you really lose me. You see, I was born indoctrinated into the Christian way of thinking, so I know already where you are coming from. I have since learned from much research and soul-searching that there is way too much deception in the religious system called Christianity for me to just accept what is taught in the churches or read and accept the Bible verbatim (a book I feel is very much misunderstood, shrouded in mystery, and commonly misinterpreted by the majority of its readers). So, I will suffice to say that spirituality is my only concern (something that is found in all religions, but often ignored). To live by the words of Jesus is one thing, but to concern yourself so much with Revelation and all of its metaphorical meanings and many interpretations… quite another. So might I say that just because Alan doesn’t share your religious conviction, it does not necessarily mean he has an atheist agenda. In fact, he even ends all of his shows with “… and may your god or gods go with you.” So if anything, he is respectful to other’s beliefs. Anything he tells you about the history concerning religious deception and the corruption of the church is for you to take and learn from (in other words, research it yourself), or simply ignore it and see what else he has to offer (which is quite a lot!).

    3. Alex Jones has many people on his show. Just because Alan appears frequently does not necessarily mean that the two of them have some kind of secret agenda. Alex more than likely invites him on the show because the information Alan brings to the table is very throughly researched and thought out, more so than the majority of the other guests he has on. Does it mean you have to believe everything he says? No, of course not. That’s why we have minds to discern. I personally don’t listen to Alex’s show because I think he is a horrible radio host, but that’s just me. I was always a little suspect that he receives so much attention, but unless you can prove he is a CIA asset, I will just assume that he has a lot of people and organizations supporting him (though, if the CIA happens to be feeding him disinfo from time to time, it would not surprise me one bit). In any case, one goes on his radio show to get more attention. It’s as plain and simple as that. The more people that are introduced to you and what you have to say-=the wider your audience=the more sponsorship/support you get=the more your message is heard! Are you to tell me that you wouldn’t go on his show if you were invited? I would think you would, because for sure it would draw more attention to your site here and more people would hear your take on things.

    Well, I appreciate you explaining yourself, and might I add that you did not offend me. I just get frustrated when people spend so much time worrying about who can be trusted and who can’t, who’s serving what agenda, and so on… instead of just using their own discernment and letting others do the same. We have enough obstacles as it is, it certainly doesn’t help to pull our attention inward and start accusing each other of being “shills” and what have you. After all, this is exactly what “they” want.

  3. Edward Forsythe 19 December 2009 at 8:07 PM Permalink

    This group is very open about the fact that they are against the New World Order. Any occult symbolism used is probably intentionally used to try to expose the occult. Same with the fact that they named an album HAARP, they are trying to expose HAARP. Just listen to the lyrics of the song you're criticizing, 'Uprising'.

    "They'll try to push drugs
    Keep us all dumbed down and hope that
    We will never see the truth around

    Another promise, another scene, another
    A package not to keep us trapped in greed
    With all the green belts wrapped around our minds
    And endless red tape to keep the truth confined

    They will not force us
    They will stop degrading us
    They will not control us
    We will be victorious"

    By the way I wasn't aware teddy bears were part of the occult agenda… Come on… Not everything is a part of the elite agenda. This post is just sowing division against people trying to expose the truth.

    • marcoponce 19 December 2009 at 8:22 PM Permalink

      That song made it unto the VATICAN'S MySpace playlist… it is made for them talking about us (the real truthsayers grounded in the av1611 KJV Bible… THE REAL TRUTH)

      The elite vs the sheep

      not

      the sheep vs the elite

      THE MUSE COVER SAYS IT ALL PAYING HOMAGE TO THE COMING ANTI-CHRIST SPOKEN OF IN THE BIBLE.

      • Edward Forsythe 25 December 2009 at 7:30 AM Permalink

        This is stating the obvious, but the group has no control over whether the Vatican adds them to their playlist or not. If you yourself chose to release an album, the Vatican could easily add one of your songs to their playlist, but that would not make you an occultist or a 'Temporal Coadjutor'.

        Also could you expand on why you think the cover represents the Antichrist? I see the figure of a man but where do you get that he is the Antichrist? What makes you think the figure is traveling from Saturn, and for that matter where do you get the idea that the Antichrist is going to come from Saturn? It seems like you are taking the hexagons in the image, imagining they are hexagrams and then using that to associate them with Saturn. It really seems like a huge stretch of logic and grasping at straws to me (and of course, even if it did represent the Antichrist, that would not necessarily be an endorsement of him).

        I notice you like some modern popular music like Lauryn Hill. I think it's ironic that as far as I know Lauryn Hill has never come out against global government or the New World Order and yet you use some vague lyrics of hers to claim she is standing up against the Jesuits. Meanwhile when a group comes out that is openly taking a stand against the New World Order you bash them based on some supposed 'occult links' that are total speculation. I'm sure if I scoured all of Lauryn Hill's lyrics and videos I could come up with just as much 'evidence' that she is an Illuminati witch.

    • Samantha 19 October 2010 at 2:26 PM Permalink

      This song is not about exposeing HAARP. The guitarist read a book called the Tales of a Corporate Hit Man. It’s a book about where corporation take over the government.!

  4. marcoponce 20 January 2010 at 12:38 AM Permalink

    I agree completely… this is a song for the \”elite\”

    let alone it was featured by THE VATICAN/MYSTERY BABYLON on their myspace music playlist alongside 2-pac

  5. Antiklaus 31 August 2010 at 5:27 PM Permalink

    Anyone who thinks Muse supports the Antichrist or the New World Order hasn’t done their homework.

    They have dozens of songs which expose the New World Order and their agenda, which they do in song lyrics and titles.

    MK Ultra
    Uprising
    ExoGenesis

    They have even worn tee shirts supporting “Terror Storm” – an anti-new world order video – on stage and commented on it!

  6. Bastian 29 June 2011 at 9:49 AM Permalink

    Please wake up!

    Bands like Muse will NOT save you from the so-called “illuminati/new world order”. In fact, bands like Muse are promoting the very illuminati/new world order they claim to expose. Do you honoustly believe that bands that opose the ruling elite would be permitted to “enlighten the masses” like that? Think! You must understand that the real illuminati never planned on ceasing control of this world by overt force. Instead they manipulate and incite the masses so they will get mad, revolt and eventually call for a radical new order. The 1984, “fascist new world order” that is being promoted by so many so-called “truthseekers” today is only a means to an end. It is a deliberate lie, designed to get the masses to revolt and overthrow the existing powerstructures so that the real new world order can come into being. A planetary REVOLUTION is what they are really after. And when that happens (and time is indead running out) THEY will take control and establish their new world order. Undersatnd, this will be something the vast majority of people WILL WANT and EMBRACE! Many “truthseekers” are being brainwashed to believe that they are “exposing” the new world order while in fact, they are only being shown some of the chaos that they themselves have purposely created! And out of this purposely created chaos, they intent to form their REAL new world order. And they are counting on YOU to make this happen!

    I tell you no lie. If you honoustly seek the Truth, you must repent and believe in Jesus Christ. Only true christians will recognise and see the real new world order for what it is: The final worldwide antichrist empire. And don’t bother joining ANY churches either. They all are illuminati controlled. And most of christianity is based on false doctrines anyway. In the new world order, there will be a new universal spiritual pardigm that is now already being promoted through the new age and increasingly through churches aswell. Just read the Bible and pray to God for guidance through His Spirit and that He will reveal His Truth to you.

    I know that most will oppose this message.
    But some will hear and take heat.
    You know who you are.


Leave a Reply